Practical Considerations for Early Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Canadian Landscape in 2025

Authors

  • C.W. Phua, MD, FRCPC Western University, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Southwestern Ontario Bleeding Disorders Program, Adult Hematology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON
  • Sylvia McCulloch, MD, MSc, FRCPC University of Calgary, Calgary, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, Calgary, AB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58931/cht.2025.4s0161

Abstract

Multiple-class drug combinations have long been integral to the management of multiple myeloma (MM). This has led to significant advances in myeloma survival with agents such as lenalidomide and daratumumab moving to frontline therapy. Therefore, relapse therapy requires rational sequencing strategies to prioritize effective regimens with each treatment line without compromising access to subsequent lines.

At first relapse, most transplant-eligible patients would have undergone RVd (lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone) induction with subsequent consolidative high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue and Len (lenalidomide) maintenance. For transplantineligible patients, frontline therapy with DRd (daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) has become the standard of care until myeloma progression or drug intolerance. With the increasing adoption of quadruple therapy in frontline treatment, a significant proportion of patients will soon be multi-class exposed or refractory at early relapse, including exposure to daratumumab, lenalidomide, and bortezomib.

This shift necessitates careful consideration of treatment sequences based on available regimens, which include previous treatment responses, cytogenetic and molecular risk profiles (e.g., high-risk versus standard-risk disease), disease kinetics at relapse, and the potential benefit of therapies with novel mechanisms of action. Achieving and maintaining sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is also critical, as patients in this category consistently experience better outcomes, regardless of cytogenetic risk or line of therapy.

Author Biographies

C.W. Phua, MD, FRCPC, Western University, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Southwestern Ontario Bleeding Disorders Program, Adult Hematology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON

Dr. Chai Phua is an Associate Professor at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, and a Hematologist-Oncologist at London Health Sciences Centre. His clinical expertise spans lymphoid malignancies, plasma cell disorders, and bleeding disorders. After earning his medical degree from Memorial University, he completed a Hematology fellowship at the University of Toronto. Dr. Phua is actively engaged in clinical research and medical education. He is currently spearheading the implementation of mass spectrometry at London Health Sciences Centre to enhance diagnostic precision and improve patient outcomes in multiple myeloma.

Sylvia McCulloch, MD, MSc, FRCPC, University of Calgary, Calgary, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, Calgary, AB

Dr. McCulloch completed her undergraduate and postgraduate medical training at the University of Calgary. This was followed by a fellowship in Multiple Myeloma at the University of Calgary and a Master of Science (with Merit) in Health Economics, Management and Policy at the London School of Economics.   Presently, she is a clinical associate professor at the University of Calgary and the site lead for hematology at the Peter Lougheed Centre. She treats patients with multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, MGUS and other hematologic disorders at the PLC and Tom Baker Cancer Centre.

References

Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, Neri P, Paiva B, Samur M, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020;4(23):5988-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827

Canada’s Drug Agency- L’Agence des medicaments du Canada. CADTH Reimbursement Review - Porvisional Funding Algorithm. Indication: Multiple myeloma. 2024 August.

Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, et al. Overall Survival With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (POLLUX): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(8):1590-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00940

Mateos MV, Sonneveld P, Hungria V, Nooka AK, Estell JA, Barreto W, et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Three-year Follow-up of CASTOR. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(8):509-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.623

Spencer A, Lentzsch S, Weisel K, Avet-Loiseau H, Mark TM, Spicka I, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica. 2018;103(12):2079-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.194118

Mian H, Eisfeld C, Venner CP, Masih-Khan E, Kardjadj M, Jimenez-Zepeda VH, et al. Efficacy of Daratumumab-Containing Regimens Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Lenalidomide Maintenance: Retrospective Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:826342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.826342

Schmidt J, Braggio E, Kortuem KM, Egan JB, Zhu YX, Xin CS, et al. Genome-wide studies in multiple myeloma identify XPO1/CRM1 as a critical target validated using the selective nuclear export inhibitor KPT-276. Leukemia. 2013;27(12):2357-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.172

Schiller GJ, Lipe BC, Bahlis NJ, Tuchman SA, Bensinger WI, Sutherland HJ, at al. Selinexor-Based Triplet Regimens in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Sep;23(9):e286-e296.e4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.001

Richard S, Chari A, Delimpasi S, Simonova M, Spicka I, Pour L, et al. Selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: Outcomes by cytogenetic risk. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(9):1120-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26261

Tai YT, Landesman Y, Acharya C, Calle Y, Zhong MY, Cea M, et al. CRM1 inhibition induces tumor cell cytotoxicity and impairs osteoclastogenesis in multiple myeloma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Leukemia. 2014;28(1):155-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.115

Grosicki S, Simonova M, Spicka I, Pour L, Kriachok I, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10262):1563–1573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32292-3

Mateos MV, Engelhardt M, Leleu X, Mesa MG, Cavo M, Dimopoulos M, et al. Impact of prior treatment on selinexor, bortezomib, dexamethasone outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended follow-up subgroup analysis of the BOSTON trial. Eur J Haematol. 2024;113(2):242-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14223

Mateos MV, Engelhardt M, Leleu X, Mesa MG, Auner HW, Cavo M, et al. P917: Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results of Boston Trial by Prior Therapies. Hemasphere. 2023;7(S3):e7454106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HS9.0000970572.74541.06

Jagannath S, Delimpasi S, Grosicki S, Van Domelen DR, Bentur OS, Spicka I, et al. Association of Selinexor Dose Reductions With Clinical Outcomes in the BOSTON Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23(12):917-23 e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2023.08.018

FORUS Therapeutics Inc. Product monograph XPOVIO 2022 [Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00066090.PDF].

Nooka AK, Costa LJ, Gasparetto CJ, Richardson PG, Siegel DS, Chari A, et al. Guidance for Use and dosing of Selinexor in Multiple Myeloma in 2021: Consensus From International Myeloma Foundation Expert Roundtable. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;22(7):e526-e31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.014

Mateos M, Gavriatopoulou M, Facon T, Auner HW, Leleu X, Hajek R, et al. Effect of Prior Treatment with Proteasome Inhibitors on the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Comparison with Twice-Weekly Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Subgroup Analysis from the Boston Study. Blood. 2020;136(Supplement 1):48-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-138391

Kuhn DJ, Chen Q, Voorhees PM, Strader JS, Shenk KD, Sun CM, et al. Potent activity of carfilzomib, a novel, irreversible inhibitor of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, against preclinical models of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2007;110(9):3281-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-01-065888

Sudalagunta PR , Renatino-Canevarolo R , Meads MB, Coelho Siqueira Silva MD, Cubitt C, De Avila G, et al. Rationale for Selinexor Treatment in Daratumumab-Refractory MM Patients Identified by Paired Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity and RNA-seq. Presented at: The 63rd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 11-14, 2021; Atlanta, GA. 2021.

Gavriatopoulou M, Chari A, Chen C, Bahlis N, Vogl DT, Jakubowiak A, et al. Integrated safety profile of selinexor in multiple myeloma: experience from 437 patients enrolled in clinical trials. Leukemia. 2020;34(9):2430-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0756-6

Purdue Pharma. Product monograph: Akynzeo 2017 [Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00041433.PDF].

Merck Canada Inc. Product monograph: Emend 2014 [Available from: https://www.merck.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2021/04/EMEND-PM_E.pdf].

Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10292):2361-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00592-4

Capra M, Martin T, Moreau P, Martinez G, Oriol A, Koh Y, et al. Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Ikema Subgroup Analysis By Number of Prior Lines of Treatment. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):7138-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-162731

Martin T, Dimopoulos MA, Mikhael J, Yong K, Capra M, Facon T, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results from IKEMA, a randomized Phase 3 study. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13(1):72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00797-8

Vesole DH, Berdeja J, Matous J, Trudel S, Schade H, Munster P, et al. P902: Isatuximab, weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone as salvage therapy for RRMM; interim results from a phase 2 trial. HemaSphere. 2023;7(S3):e5189693.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HS9.0000970512.51896.93

Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, et al. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10214):2096-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HS9.0000561576.58696.ae

Richardson PG, Perrot A, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I, Leleu X, et al. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): follow-up analysis of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(3):416-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00019-5

Richardson PG, Oriol A, Beksac M, Liberati AM, Galli M, Schjesvold F, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):781-794.

Dimopoulos M, Weisel K, Moreau P, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): outcomes by prior treatment at first relapse. Leukemia. 2021;35:1722-1731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01021-3

Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Joshua D, Pour L, Hájek R, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7

Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Oriol A, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1327-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8

Moreau P, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Palumbo A, Goldschmidt H, Hájek R, et al. Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leukemia. 2017 Jan;31(1):115-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.186

Miguel JS, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):1055-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70380-2

LeBlanc R, Mian H, Reece D, Su J, Masih-Khan E, Chu M, Jimenez-Zepeda V, Sebag M, Song K, Louzada M, Kotb R, Visram A, White D, Stakiw J, Reiman A, Aslam M, Bergstrom D, Kaedbey R, Gul E, Venner C. Outcome of carfilzomib/pomalidomide-based regimens after daratumumab-based treatment in relapsed multiple myeloma: A Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database analysis. Eur J Haematol. 2023 Nov;111(5):815-823. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14082. Epub 2023 Aug 13. PMID: 37574220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14082

Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, Quach H, Ho PJ, Beksac M, et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(4):301-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312054

Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu XP, Beksac M, Pour L, Hajek R, et al. Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2400712

Dimopoulos MA, Hungria VTM, Radinoff A, Delimpasi S, Mikala G, Masszi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of single-agent belantamab mafodotin versus pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised study. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(10):e801-e12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00243-0

Hungria V, Robak P, Hus M, Zherebtsova V, Ward C, Ho PJ, et al. Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):393-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2405090

Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, Pour L, Delimpasi S, Vorobyev V, Quach H, et al. Belantamab Mafodotin, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):408-421.30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2403407

San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, Spencer A, Anguille S, Mateos MV, et al. Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 27;389(4):335-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2303379

Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, Patel K, Cavo M, Nooka AK, et al. Ide-cel or Standard Regimens in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 16;388(11):1002-1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2213614

Downloads

Published

2025-01-22

How to Cite

1.
Phua C, McCulloch S. Practical Considerations for Early Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Canadian Landscape in 2025. Can Hematol Today [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 22 [cited 2025 Jan. 30];4(s01):2–11. Available from: https://canadianhematologytoday.com/article/view/4-s01-Phua_et_al

Issue

Section

Articles