Acute myeloid leukemia induction in the age of novel therapeutic agents

Authors

  • Nicholas Allen Forward, MD, MSc, FRCPC Division of Hematology and Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University; Nova Scotia Health

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58931/cht.2023.2234

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant neoplasm of the myeloid lineage characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature myeloid blasts in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. AML is a heterogenous disease which occurs across the age spectrum, although with an increasing incidence with age. For decades, first-line, curative-intent therapy has been based on intensive therapy with anthracycline (typically daunorubicin or idarubicin) plus cytarabine (3+7), followed by additional consolidative chemotherapy and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. While improvements over the decades in overall survival have been observed, until recently this has been driven largely by advancements in supportive care leading to reduction in treatment-related mortality and allowing a greater proportion of patients (particularly older individuals) to safely undergo intensive therapy induction and consolidation. Despite this, five-year overall survival (OS) rates in older individuals are as low as 5% (age > 70). Although OS for patients age 15-39 is now in the range of 50%-60%, a large portion of patients still succumb to their disease. Cytogenetic and molecular profiling has led to defined risk categories, and complete risk stratification for all patients eligible for intensive therapy is crucial to aiding in the selection of optimal induction and post- remission therapy. In recent years, an improved understanding of AML biology and genetics has led to the approval of a number of novel therapies for patients deemed fit and unfit for intensive therapy, which may finally be moving the needle beyond 3+7. This article will review a current approach to AML induction patients eligible for intensive therapy, with a focus on the utilization of available novel agents.

Author Biography

Nicholas Allen Forward, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University; Nova Scotia Health

Dr. Nicholas Forward is a Hematologist and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Nova Scotia Health/Dalhousie University, and practices at the QEII Health Sciences Centre in Halifax. Prior to medical school, he completed B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Microbiology and Immunology. He completed medical school, as well as Internal Medicine and Hematology residencies at Dalhousie University. His clinical practice is predominantly malignant hematology including all disease sites, with a special interest in lymphoproliferative disorders and lymphoma. He is currently co-chair of the Nova Scotia Cancer Care Program Hematology disease site. Dr. Forward is active in medical education at both the undergraduate and post-graduate levels, currently serving as Clerkship Director for the Department of Medicine, as CBD lead for the Dalhousie Hematology training program, and as a member of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Hematology Subspecialty Committee.

References

Sasaki K, Ravandi F, Kadia TM, DiNardo CD, Short NJ, Borthakur G, Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM. De novo acute myeloid leukemia: A population-based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 1980 to 2017. Cancer. 2021 Jun 15;127(12):2049-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33458

Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Breitruck J, Benner A, Kreitmeier S, Tobis K, Döhner H, Döhner K. Prognostic significance of activating FLT3 mutations in younger adults (16 to 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: a study of the AML Study Group Ulm. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4372-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-05-1440

Abbas HA, Alfayez M, Kadia T, Ravandi-Kashani F, Daver N. Midostaurin in acute myeloid leukemia: an evidence-based review and patient selection. Cancer Management and Research. 2019;11:8817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S177894

Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, Laumann K, Geyer S, Bloomfield CD, Thiede C, Prior TW, Döhner K, Marcucci G, Lo-Coco F. Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):454-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1614359

Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE, Neubauer A, Berman E, Paolini S, Montesinos P, Baer MR, Larson RA, Ustun C, Fabbiano F. Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019 Oct 30:381:1728-1740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1902688

Gilteritinib vs Midostaurin in FLT3 Mutated AML. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03836209.

Castaigne S, Pautas C, Terré C, Raffoux E, Bordessoule D, Bastie JN, Legrand O, Thomas X, Turlure P, Reman O, de Revel T. Effect of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on survival of adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia (ALFA-0701): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2012 Apr 21;379(9825):1508-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60485-1

Hills RK, Castaigne S, Appelbaum FR, Delaunay J, Petersdorf S, Othus M, Estey EH, Dombret H, Chevret S, Ifrah N, Cahn JY. Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Oncology. 2014 Aug 1;15(9):986-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70281-5

Borthakur G, Kantarjian H. Core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia-2021 treatment algorithm. Blood Cancer Journal. 2021:11:114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00503-6

Montesinos P, Recher C, Vives S, Zarzycka E, Wang J, Bertani G, Heuser M, Calado RT, Schuh AC, Yeh SP, Daigle SR. Ivosidinib and azacitidine in IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022 Apr:286(6):1519-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2117344

A Study of Ivosidenib or Enasidenib in Combination with Induction Therapy and Consolidation Therapy, Followed by Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome EB2, With an IDH1 or IDH2 Mutation, Respectively, Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy (HOVON150AML). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03839771.

DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, Thirman MJ, Garcia JS, Wei AH, Konopleva M, Döhner H, Letai A, Fenaux P, Koller E. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Aug 13;383(7):617-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2012971

Wei AH, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, DiNardo CD, Novak J, Laribi K, Kim I, Stevens DA, Fiedler W, Pagoni M, Samoilova O. Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 2020 Jun 11;135(24):2137-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020004856

Wang H, Mao L, Qian P, et al. Venetoclax plus 3+7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy as first-line treatment for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicentre, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Hematol 2022:9:E415-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00106-5

Venetoclax Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in AML and Advanced MDS. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05342584

OK CY, Patel KP, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Mutational profiling of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia by next-generation sequencing, a comparison with de novo diseases. Leukemia Research. 2015 Mar 1;39:348-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2014.12.006

Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, Stuart RK, Strickland SA, Hogge D, Solomon SR, Stone RM. CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) liposome for injection versus conventional cytarabine plus daunorubicin in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018 Sep 9;36(26):2684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6112

Lee D, Jain AG, Deutsch Y, Eatrides J, Chan O, Padron E, Kuykendall A, Komrokji R, Lancet J, Sallman D, Talati C. CPX-351 yields similar response and survival outcome in younger and older patients with secondary AML. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia. 2022 Oct 1;22(10):774-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.06.001

Przespolewski AC, Talati C, Fazal S, Vachhani P, Sanikommu S, Thota S, Baron J, Griffiths EA, Thompson JE, Sweet KL, Wang ES. Safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in younger patients< 60 years old with secondary acute myeloid leukemia: An updated analysis. Blood 2022:138(supp 1):1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-153791

Wei AH, Döhner H, Pocock C, Montesinos P, Afanasyev B, Dombret H, Ravandi F, Sayar H, Jang JH, Porkka K, Selleslag D. Oral azacitidine maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2526-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004444

Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, Ebert BL, Fenaux P, Godley LA, Hasserjian RP, Larson RA. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2022 Sep 22:140(12):1345-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022016867

Published

2023-06-07

How to Cite

1.
Forward NA. Acute myeloid leukemia induction in the age of novel therapeutic agents. Can Hematol Today [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 7 [cited 2025 Jan. 2];2(2):21–25. Available from: https://canadianhematologytoday.com/article/view/2-2-forward

Issue

Section

Articles